TedTest

From the Ted Talk by Kate Wagner: I hate McMansions -- and you should too

Unscramble the Blue Letters

First of all, I'd like to apologize to anyone in the room who considers themselves to be acirutrhlectlay sensitive. What you're about to see may upset you. So, the nebumr one question I get in my inbox all the time is, so McMansion hell, what the hell is McMansion? So, it's prtety easy. I've narrowed it down to a cloupe of fortacs. First of all, they are oversized. That means there's over 3,000 sarque feet which is 500 feet more than the highest national housing average. So, AKA that space, as you can see here probably 26 cdihlern. (Laughter) And the other thing is, if you look at this house, which is quite lovely, (Laughter) I'm sorry. This house probably has three media rmoos, seven bathrooms with a grdean tub, and a cnidleaher and whatever, but it doesn't have a front porch and I cannot find the front door. (Laughter) Also there's no lawn So, that lades to my second point, they are poorly designed. So, that means there's no respect for form or sclae or other things that plpoee in the architecture would call 'the basic rules of architecture.' So, as you can see here, this house looks like it was designed by someone who maybe saw a house once in their life, but either had some sort of visual issues or was wearing kpociosdlaee gelsass that you get during Halloween. Even worse these poorly designed houses are cheaply constructed. So, I will get to that in a second. But, I'd like to point out that this is an engineering marevl. This is a house that is a wood fmare covered in different types of foam. (Laughter) So, and finally, they are detserpfcusil. (lgeuthar) So, you have to feel really bad for the poor folks in these little husoes who on longer have any natural light in their homes. It is a dark time for them as it is for all of us. So, basically they are fuaeanllmntdy bad architecture. Now, even though I'm dressed impeccably well, I'm not the gatekeeper of what is and is not good aesthetic architecture. But, we've been talking about these things in architectural history for thousands of yraes starting with Vitruvius, the great-great-great -granddaddy of architecture. Sorry art history majors, this is going to be boring. So, Vitruvius said that architecture should be three things, right? It should be durable, it should be useful or functional, and it should be beautiful. And McMansions are well, you know, none of these things. So, let's start with durable. So, through most of huamn history houses were built to last generations, that means that you were born in the house, had kids in your house, died in your house, and then your kids had kids in your house and died in your house. AKA, they were permanent. That chegand in the 1980s with acescs to cheaper construction methods and materials and also in deregulation economies, etc, causing a huge housing blbbue, right? That we all know of. And basically these houses weren't bliut to last 15 years, because they were built to have the most amount of sacpe for the lowest pcire, and people didn't really care about how long they'd last anyway because they were going to live there for maybe six years, maybe less because they were going to flip that house and make, like, a million dollars. A mlilion dollars. (Laughter) And they would be on the next house before you ever knew it, so it was not their problem anymore, but we all know how that ended. So that brings me to another part of durability- they are not aesthetically durable. That means that certain house designs like you know, you have the box, and the box has a roof and the roof looks like this, and this is the house that every child draws, this is your idea of the house. These houses, of course, as you can see in this case, this is a house that is got water dgmaae, and the balconies don't lay anywhere, you can actually go out open those doors, you will fall into your yard. (Laughter) These were just trends. People saw stuff like this on TV and said, "I want that on my house." And so they're not really aesthetically durable because they were built on these trends, and when the trends ran out, they would be onto the third house or the fourth house because they were fppiilng and making millions of dollars. So, according to blemroobg now, these houses aren't selling well. And houses that are smaller, you know, like normal people houses, built for normal people not giant cars to live in, are appreciating at a much higher and faster rate. And so we are gonna move on to useful. What does it mean for house to be useful? So there are primary uses for a house. One is to keep us, you know, out of the elements. Like you saw in the last example, it's not doing a good job of that with the water damage in the missing deck. Oh, speaking of the elements, imaging trying to heat and cool that house. So you can't even stay warm or cool without spending millions of darlols. (Laughter) But most of all, a house is suppose to be our home. It's a place for our sanctuary, community, and being one with our families. And in a space that is designed where everyone has their own room, and their own living room, and their own dining room, and their own pool table? You don't have to interact with any members of your family. So tsurt me I would have loved that in the stenveh grade. But I think most of us are the well-adjusted people that we are, because we've had to fight with our siblings in our parents, and all these things that come from living in a smaller-knit space. And when you rob that sense of community from our homes, what real prosupe do they have? But McMansions ignore both of these purposes to foucs on a new purpose, and that purpose was the house is an asset, the house was now becoming through sriees of, you know, deregulatory economic picoeils, etc, a liuiqd asest, it was money, it was no longer a place to live, and it was seperated from the sense of pacle and space that we know and consider our homes, and so beautiful. McMansions don't follow the rules of traditional architecture, but really love to use the icons and the symbols, and shapes of the traditional architecture like columns in windows styles, and the box with the roof, though the roof is three times as big as the box. And in this case, you can see none of the windows actually mtcah. Some have muntains which is the bits that separate the panes of glass, and some don't, and most of all it looks like it is a smeriancg animal. (Laughter) So, there's no regard for basic matching, scale, you know, the rules of architecture, because they were dnseegid mostly from the inside out, and mommy really needed her cathedral ceilings in the bathroom. You know sometimes that meant you had a roof on that looked like this. Okay what's the point, right? Why do I even care about McMansions if they are so horrible, and why do I write about them? Well, it's about education. 60 percent of people according to the U.S. census bureau live in the surubbs, and not all of us have access to the fabric of our cities that have buildings from different eras, and all their buuateifl details, all interwoven into an urban fabric. Most of us have to live with, you know, moncsnaims. And so it's about thanceig with what you have, and also they're plaitlcoliy charged. They're sort of the pestor clihd of the recession, and they are attached to concepts like urinsabm and sustainability and other things that make up a better world. You might be still asking, "Okay, well, why not talk about you know good architecture?" Well why so negative? I sretatd writing about architecture in high school to defned bnglidius like this. This is the geshon Government Centre by Paul Rudolph, in Goshen, New York which is undergoing, what I like to call 'a murder.' (Laughter). I discovered, in the fight for preservation of late modernist and post-modernist arhictrtcuee which is the part that I like, if you were on the side of "I don't like this," you have the advantage. People say, "Oh, I like this," and like, okay, but if you say, "I don't like this," then like why? And if you don't know why you're pretty much a jerk - but that gets people tknilag and starts a disscusion and so in McMansion hell I saw this opportunity to explore, because a lof people hate McMansions but they have no idea why. They're like, "I hate that, it's big and it's ugly!", but they don't know what is so ugly about it or why it seems so big, and that's sort of where I come in, and it binrgs me to my fanil point. It's about the greater purpose. So my professor at Peabody where I study acoustics has this saying that says, "The first step to good design is avoiding the bad, then you can design the good, and the first step to avoiding the bad is recognizing the bad." It's about looking at the wrlod through a critical eye, and the best part about being snarky is that you are automatically cciairtl. And so people can say, avoiding the bad, right? You don't want a house thet looks like the ginormous thing that's on the seercn here. This is lirltlaey the McMansion, it is a huose that someone took to their little mouth and blew up into a balloon. It's like they took the nice house with the cable and (pffus) Now if you know I don't like that, and here's why I don't like that then I can sratt thinking about encouraging other people and educating them about why I don't like that and they don't like that. And maybe through this sort of education and design, getting people who don't care about design to talk about design is another really huge step in perpetuating better design. And so through using America's ugliest and most hated houses, I mean, I'm sorry. We can... (Laughter) In talking about them in a way that iountcedrs humor so it's not, "I'm shoving my good dsgien down your throat, dang you!" We can encourage people through discussion, through education, through empowerment, to be a greater force for cnhage, and a change towards a more beautiful, a more sbuasalinte, a more inclusive, and you know, a better-looking world. (Laughter) Or at least, prevent them from building more McMansions. Thank you! (Applause)

Open Cloze

First of all, I'd like to apologize to anyone in the room who considers themselves to be _______________ sensitive. What you're about to see may upset you. So, the ______ one question I get in my inbox all the time is, so McMansion hell, what the hell is McMansion? So, it's ______ easy. I've narrowed it down to a ______ of _______. First of all, they are oversized. That means there's over 3,000 ______ feet which is 500 feet more than the highest national housing average. So, AKA that space, as you can see here probably 26 ________. (Laughter) And the other thing is, if you look at this house, which is quite lovely, (Laughter) I'm sorry. This house probably has three media _____, seven bathrooms with a ______ tub, and a __________ and whatever, but it doesn't have a front porch and I cannot find the front door. (Laughter) Also there's no lawn So, that _____ to my second point, they are poorly designed. So, that means there's no respect for form or _____ or other things that ______ in the architecture would call 'the basic rules of architecture.' So, as you can see here, this house looks like it was designed by someone who maybe saw a house once in their life, but either had some sort of visual issues or was wearing ____________ _______ that you get during Halloween. Even worse these poorly designed houses are cheaply constructed. So, I will get to that in a second. But, I'd like to point out that this is an engineering ______. This is a house that is a wood _____ covered in different types of foam. (Laughter) So, and finally, they are _____________. (________) So, you have to feel really bad for the poor folks in these little ______ who on longer have any natural light in their homes. It is a dark time for them as it is for all of us. So, basically they are _____________ bad architecture. Now, even though I'm dressed impeccably well, I'm not the gatekeeper of what is and is not good aesthetic architecture. But, we've been talking about these things in architectural history for thousands of _____ starting with Vitruvius, the great-great-great -granddaddy of architecture. Sorry art history majors, this is going to be boring. So, Vitruvius said that architecture should be three things, right? It should be durable, it should be useful or functional, and it should be beautiful. And McMansions are well, you know, none of these things. So, let's start with durable. So, through most of _____ history houses were built to last generations, that means that you were born in the house, had kids in your house, died in your house, and then your kids had kids in your house and died in your house. AKA, they were permanent. That _______ in the 1980s with ______ to cheaper construction methods and materials and also in deregulation economies, etc, causing a huge housing ______, right? That we all know of. And basically these houses weren't _____ to last 15 years, because they were built to have the most amount of _____ for the lowest _____, and people didn't really care about how long they'd last anyway because they were going to live there for maybe six years, maybe less because they were going to flip that house and make, like, a million dollars. A _______ dollars. (Laughter) And they would be on the next house before you ever knew it, so it was not their problem anymore, but we all know how that ended. So that brings me to another part of durability- they are not aesthetically durable. That means that certain house designs like you know, you have the box, and the box has a roof and the roof looks like this, and this is the house that every child draws, this is your idea of the house. These houses, of course, as you can see in this case, this is a house that is got water ______, and the balconies don't lay anywhere, you can actually go out open those doors, you will fall into your yard. (Laughter) These were just trends. People saw stuff like this on TV and said, "I want that on my house." And so they're not really aesthetically durable because they were built on these trends, and when the trends ran out, they would be onto the third house or the fourth house because they were ________ and making millions of dollars. So, according to _________ now, these houses aren't selling well. And houses that are smaller, you know, like normal people houses, built for normal people not giant cars to live in, are appreciating at a much higher and faster rate. And so we are gonna move on to useful. What does it mean for house to be useful? So there are primary uses for a house. One is to keep us, you know, out of the elements. Like you saw in the last example, it's not doing a good job of that with the water damage in the missing deck. Oh, speaking of the elements, imaging trying to heat and cool that house. So you can't even stay warm or cool without spending millions of _______. (Laughter) But most of all, a house is suppose to be our home. It's a place for our sanctuary, community, and being one with our families. And in a space that is designed where everyone has their own room, and their own living room, and their own dining room, and their own pool table? You don't have to interact with any members of your family. So _____ me I would have loved that in the _______ grade. But I think most of us are the well-adjusted people that we are, because we've had to fight with our siblings in our parents, and all these things that come from living in a smaller-knit space. And when you rob that sense of community from our homes, what real _______ do they have? But McMansions ignore both of these purposes to _____ on a new purpose, and that purpose was the house is an asset, the house was now becoming through ______ of, you know, deregulatory economic ________, etc, a ______ _____, it was money, it was no longer a place to live, and it was seperated from the sense of _____ and space that we know and consider our homes, and so beautiful. McMansions don't follow the rules of traditional architecture, but really love to use the icons and the symbols, and shapes of the traditional architecture like columns in windows styles, and the box with the roof, though the roof is three times as big as the box. And in this case, you can see none of the windows actually _____. Some have muntains which is the bits that separate the panes of glass, and some don't, and most of all it looks like it is a _________ animal. (Laughter) So, there's no regard for basic matching, scale, you know, the rules of architecture, because they were ________ mostly from the inside out, and mommy really needed her cathedral ceilings in the bathroom. You know sometimes that meant you had a roof on that looked like this. Okay what's the point, right? Why do I even care about McMansions if they are so horrible, and why do I write about them? Well, it's about education. 60 percent of people according to the U.S. census bureau live in the _______, and not all of us have access to the fabric of our cities that have buildings from different eras, and all their _________ details, all interwoven into an urban fabric. Most of us have to live with, you know, __________. And so it's about ________ with what you have, and also they're ___________ charged. They're sort of the ______ _____ of the recession, and they are attached to concepts like ________ and sustainability and other things that make up a better world. You might be still asking, "Okay, well, why not talk about you know good architecture?" Well why so negative? I _______ writing about architecture in high school to ______ _________ like this. This is the ______ Government Centre by Paul Rudolph, in Goshen, New York which is undergoing, what I like to call 'a murder.' (Laughter). I discovered, in the fight for preservation of late modernist and post-modernist ____________ which is the part that I like, if you were on the side of "I don't like this," you have the advantage. People say, "Oh, I like this," and like, okay, but if you say, "I don't like this," then like why? And if you don't know why you're pretty much a jerk - but that gets people _______ and starts a disscusion and so in McMansion hell I saw this opportunity to explore, because a lof people hate McMansions but they have no idea why. They're like, "I hate that, it's big and it's ugly!", but they don't know what is so ugly about it or why it seems so big, and that's sort of where I come in, and it ______ me to my _____ point. It's about the greater purpose. So my professor at Peabody where I study acoustics has this saying that says, "The first step to good design is avoiding the bad, then you can design the good, and the first step to avoiding the bad is recognizing the bad." It's about looking at the _____ through a critical eye, and the best part about being snarky is that you are automatically ________. And so people can say, avoiding the bad, right? You don't want a house thet looks like the ginormous thing that's on the ______ here. This is _________ the McMansion, it is a _____ that someone took to their little mouth and blew up into a balloon. It's like they took the nice house with the cable and (_____) Now if you know I don't like that, and here's why I don't like that then I can _____ thinking about encouraging other people and educating them about why I don't like that and they don't like that. And maybe through this sort of education and design, getting people who don't care about design to talk about design is another really huge step in perpetuating better design. And so through using America's ugliest and most hated houses, I mean, I'm sorry. We can... (Laughter) In talking about them in a way that __________ humor so it's not, "I'm shoving my good ______ down your throat, dang you!" We can encourage people through discussion, through education, through empowerment, to be a greater force for ______, and a change towards a more beautiful, a more ___________, a more inclusive, and you know, a better-looking world. (Laughter) Or at least, prevent them from building more McMansions. Thank you! (Applause)

Solution

urbanism
poster
screen
purpose
flipping
people
screaming
start
house
mcmansions
series
defend
human
garden
focus
architecture
match
policies
price
beautiful
chandelier
built
laughter
critical
politically
change
architecturally
scale
number
place
designed
space
trust
kaleidoscope
years
goshen
design
frame
factors
square
bubble
buildings
couple
seventh
introduces
sustainable
literally
bloomberg
houses
pretty
changed
started
rooms
world
leads
child
million
asset
damage
suburbs
marvel
fundamentally
disrespectful
brings
dollars
glasses
children
puffs
access
final
liquid
talking
teaching

Original Text

First of all, I'd like to apologize to anyone in the room who considers themselves to be architecturally sensitive. What you're about to see may upset you. So, the number one question I get in my inbox all the time is, so McMansion hell, what the hell is McMansion? So, it's pretty easy. I've narrowed it down to a couple of factors. First of all, they are oversized. That means there's over 3,000 square feet which is 500 feet more than the highest national housing average. So, AKA that space, as you can see here probably 26 children. (Laughter) And the other thing is, if you look at this house, which is quite lovely, (Laughter) I'm sorry. This house probably has three media rooms, seven bathrooms with a garden tub, and a chandelier and whatever, but it doesn't have a front porch and I cannot find the front door. (Laughter) Also there's no lawn So, that leads to my second point, they are poorly designed. So, that means there's no respect for form or scale or other things that people in the architecture would call 'the basic rules of architecture.' So, as you can see here, this house looks like it was designed by someone who maybe saw a house once in their life, but either had some sort of visual issues or was wearing kaleidoscope glasses that you get during Halloween. Even worse these poorly designed houses are cheaply constructed. So, I will get to that in a second. But, I'd like to point out that this is an engineering marvel. This is a house that is a wood frame covered in different types of foam. (Laughter) So, and finally, they are disrespectful. (Laughter) So, you have to feel really bad for the poor folks in these little houses who on longer have any natural light in their homes. It is a dark time for them as it is for all of us. So, basically they are fundamentally bad architecture. Now, even though I'm dressed impeccably well, I'm not the gatekeeper of what is and is not good aesthetic architecture. But, we've been talking about these things in architectural history for thousands of years starting with Vitruvius, the great-great-great -granddaddy of architecture. Sorry art history majors, this is going to be boring. So, Vitruvius said that architecture should be three things, right? It should be durable, it should be useful or functional, and it should be beautiful. And McMansions are well, you know, none of these things. So, let's start with durable. So, through most of human history houses were built to last generations, that means that you were born in the house, had kids in your house, died in your house, and then your kids had kids in your house and died in your house. AKA, they were permanent. That changed in the 1980s with access to cheaper construction methods and materials and also in deregulation economies, etc, causing a huge housing bubble, right? That we all know of. And basically these houses weren't built to last 15 years, because they were built to have the most amount of space for the lowest price, and people didn't really care about how long they'd last anyway because they were going to live there for maybe six years, maybe less because they were going to flip that house and make, like, a million dollars. A million dollars. (Laughter) And they would be on the next house before you ever knew it, so it was not their problem anymore, but we all know how that ended. So that brings me to another part of durability- they are not aesthetically durable. That means that certain house designs like you know, you have the box, and the box has a roof and the roof looks like this, and this is the house that every child draws, this is your idea of the house. These houses, of course, as you can see in this case, this is a house that is got water damage, and the balconies don't lay anywhere, you can actually go out open those doors, you will fall into your yard. (Laughter) These were just trends. People saw stuff like this on TV and said, "I want that on my house." And so they're not really aesthetically durable because they were built on these trends, and when the trends ran out, they would be onto the third house or the fourth house because they were flipping and making millions of dollars. So, according to Bloomberg now, these houses aren't selling well. And houses that are smaller, you know, like normal people houses, built for normal people not giant cars to live in, are appreciating at a much higher and faster rate. And so we are gonna move on to useful. What does it mean for house to be useful? So there are primary uses for a house. One is to keep us, you know, out of the elements. Like you saw in the last example, it's not doing a good job of that with the water damage in the missing deck. Oh, speaking of the elements, imaging trying to heat and cool that house. So you can't even stay warm or cool without spending millions of dollars. (Laughter) But most of all, a house is suppose to be our home. It's a place for our sanctuary, community, and being one with our families. And in a space that is designed where everyone has their own room, and their own living room, and their own dining room, and their own pool table? You don't have to interact with any members of your family. So trust me I would have loved that in the seventh grade. But I think most of us are the well-adjusted people that we are, because we've had to fight with our siblings in our parents, and all these things that come from living in a smaller-knit space. And when you rob that sense of community from our homes, what real purpose do they have? But McMansions ignore both of these purposes to focus on a new purpose, and that purpose was the house is an asset, the house was now becoming through series of, you know, deregulatory economic policies, etc, a liquid asset, it was money, it was no longer a place to live, and it was seperated from the sense of place and space that we know and consider our homes, and so beautiful. McMansions don't follow the rules of traditional architecture, but really love to use the icons and the symbols, and shapes of the traditional architecture like columns in windows styles, and the box with the roof, though the roof is three times as big as the box. And in this case, you can see none of the windows actually match. Some have muntains which is the bits that separate the panes of glass, and some don't, and most of all it looks like it is a screaming animal. (Laughter) So, there's no regard for basic matching, scale, you know, the rules of architecture, because they were designed mostly from the inside out, and mommy really needed her cathedral ceilings in the bathroom. You know sometimes that meant you had a roof on that looked like this. Okay what's the point, right? Why do I even care about McMansions if they are so horrible, and why do I write about them? Well, it's about education. 60 percent of people according to the U.S. census bureau live in the suburbs, and not all of us have access to the fabric of our cities that have buildings from different eras, and all their beautiful details, all interwoven into an urban fabric. Most of us have to live with, you know, McMansions. And so it's about teaching with what you have, and also they're politically charged. They're sort of the poster child of the recession, and they are attached to concepts like urbanism and sustainability and other things that make up a better world. You might be still asking, "Okay, well, why not talk about you know good architecture?" Well why so negative? I started writing about architecture in high school to defend buildings like this. This is the Goshen Government Centre by Paul Rudolph, in Goshen, New York which is undergoing, what I like to call 'a murder.' (Laughter). I discovered, in the fight for preservation of late modernist and post-modernist architecture which is the part that I like, if you were on the side of "I don't like this," you have the advantage. People say, "Oh, I like this," and like, okay, but if you say, "I don't like this," then like why? And if you don't know why you're pretty much a jerk - but that gets people talking and starts a disscusion and so in McMansion hell I saw this opportunity to explore, because a lof people hate McMansions but they have no idea why. They're like, "I hate that, it's big and it's ugly!", but they don't know what is so ugly about it or why it seems so big, and that's sort of where I come in, and it brings me to my final point. It's about the greater purpose. So my professor at Peabody where I study acoustics has this saying that says, "The first step to good design is avoiding the bad, then you can design the good, and the first step to avoiding the bad is recognizing the bad." It's about looking at the world through a critical eye, and the best part about being snarky is that you are automatically critical. And so people can say, avoiding the bad, right? You don't want a house thet looks like the ginormous thing that's on the screen here. This is literally the McMansion, it is a house that someone took to their little mouth and blew up into a balloon. It's like they took the nice house with the cable and (Puffs) Now if you know I don't like that, and here's why I don't like that then I can start thinking about encouraging other people and educating them about why I don't like that and they don't like that. And maybe through this sort of education and design, getting people who don't care about design to talk about design is another really huge step in perpetuating better design. And so through using America's ugliest and most hated houses, I mean, I'm sorry. We can... (Laughter) In talking about them in a way that introduces humor so it's not, "I'm shoving my good design down your throat, dang you!" We can encourage people through discussion, through education, through empowerment, to be a greater force for change, and a change towards a more beautiful, a more sustainable, a more inclusive, and you know, a better-looking world. (Laughter) Or at least, prevent them from building more McMansions. Thank you! (Applause)

Frequently Occurring Word Combinations

ngrams of length 2

collocation	frequency
poorly designed	2
million dollars	2
aesthetically durable	2
normal people	2
good design	2

Important Words

access
acoustics
advantage
aesthetic
aesthetically
aka
amount
animal
anymore
apologize
applause
appreciating
architectural
architecturally
architecture
art
asset
attached
automatically
average
avoiding
bad
balconies
balloon
basic
basically
bathroom
bathrooms
beautiful
big
bits
blew
bloomberg
boring
born
box
brings
bubble
building
buildings
built
bureau
cable
call
care
cars
case
cathedral
causing
ceilings
census
centre
chandelier
change
changed
charged
cheaper
cheaply
child
children
cities
columns
community
concepts
considers
constructed
construction
cool
couple
covered
critical
damage
dang
dark
deck
defend
deregulation
deregulatory
design
designed
designs
details
died
dining
discovered
discussion
disrespectful
disscusion
dollars
door
doors
draws
dressed
durable
easy
economic
economies
educating
education
elements
empowerment
encourage
encouraging
ended
engineering
eras
explore
eye
fabric
factors
fall
families
family
faster
feel
feet
fight
final
finally
find
flip
flipping
foam
focus
folks
follow
force
form
fourth
frame
front
functional
fundamentally
garden
gatekeeper
generations
giant
ginormous
glass
glasses
gonna
good
goshen
government
grade
greater
halloween
hate
hated
heat
hell
high
higher
highest
history
home
homes
horrible
house
houses
housing
huge
human
humor
icons
idea
ignore
imaging
impeccably
inbox
inclusive
interact
interwoven
introduces
issues
jerk
job
kaleidoscope
kids
knew
late
laughter
lawn
lay
leads
life
light
liquid
literally
live
living
lof
long
longer
looked
love
loved
lovely
lowest
majors
making
marvel
match
matching
materials
mcmansion
mcmansions
means
meant
media
members
methods
million
millions
missing
modernist
mommy
money
mouth
move
muntains
murder
narrowed
national
natural
needed
negative
nice
normal
number
open
opportunity
oversized
panes
parents
part
paul
peabody
people
percent
permanent
perpetuating
place
point
policies
politically
pool
poor
poorly
porch
poster
preservation
pretty
prevent
price
primary
problem
professor
puffs
purpose
purposes
question
ran
rate
real
recession
recognizing
regard
respect
rob
roof
room
rooms
rudolph
rules
sanctuary
scale
school
screaming
screen
selling
sense
sensitive
separate
seperated
series
seventh
shapes
shoving
siblings
side
smaller
snarky
sort
space
speaking
spending
square
start
started
starting
starts
stay
step
study
stuff
styles
suburbs
suppose
sustainability
sustainable
symbols
table
talk
talking
teaching
thet
thinking
thousands
throat
time
times
traditional
trends
trust
tub
tv
types
ugliest
ugly
undergoing
upset
urban
urbanism
visual
vitruvius
warm
water
wearing
windows
wood
world
worse
write
writing
yard
years
york